Table 1 Description of the scenario in which the interviews took place and the variables considered as external stimulus of the Altos dos Canutos Community, Municipality of Picos, PI
From: What interferes with conducting free lists? A comparative ethnobotanical experiment
| Variables | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Same location | 61.16 |
| Different location | 38.84 |
| Location type | |
| Interviewee’s house | 91.26 |
| Neighbor’s house, work | 8.74 |
| Open place | 57.28 |
| Closed place | 42.71 |
| Third party presence | |
| Absence | 23.31 |
| One event | 54.36 |
| Two events | 22.33 |
| Third party | |
| Friend | 6.77 |
| Family (grandchild, uncle, mother in law, father, etc.) | 42.37 |
| Partner | 42.37 |
| Neighbor | 8.47 |
| Third party interference | |
| No interference | 33.01 |
| Interfered in one free list | 55.34 |
| Interference in the two free lists | 11.65 |
| Presence of factors | |
| Absence | 63.10 |
| One event | 33.98 |
| Two events | 2.92 |
| Type of factors | |
| Watching TV | 26.82 |
| Working | 19.52 |
| Domestic activity | 19.52 |
| People chatting nearby | 12.19 |
| Caring for child | 14.64 |
| Others | 7.31 |